Visit our Website

• DivorceSupport.CA

About this Blog

• Family Law Blog by Niren Family Law Practice, Family and Divorce Lawyers

Latest Blogs

• When do child support payments in Ontario end?
• MP plans on private member’s motion to review Canada’s Divorce Act
• Facebook Privacy Issues and Ontario Family Courts
• Judges Interviewing Children during Ontario Family Court Divorce Cases
• Ontario Court Recognizes importance of Parental Alienation in Divorce Case

Categories

• Child Adoption
• Child Custody in Ontario
• Child Support
• Child Visitation
• Cohabitation Agreements
• Collaborative Law
• Common Law Marriage
• Divorce
• Divorce Lawyer
• Family Law Changes Ontario
• Family Property Division
• Marriage Contracts
• Mediation
• Prenuptial Agreements
• Questions and Answers
• Same Sex Marriage
• Separation Agreements
• Spousal Support
• Support Orders
• Toronto Divorce Lawyers
• Toronto Family Lawyers

Archives

• July 2010
• June 2010
• May 2010
• April 2010
• March 2010
• February 2010
• January 2010
• December 2009
• November 2009
• October 2009
• September 2009
• August 2009
• July 2009
• June 2009
• May 2009
• March 2009

Related Blogs

• The Divorce Collaborative

Tag Cloud

Bill C-422 breakdown of marriage Calder-vs-Calder child custody Children’s Law Reform Act Child Support choosing divorce lawyers CLRA Common Law Common Law Separation Custody Order Divorce Divorce Act divorce coaches divorce in recession Divorce Lawyer divorce lawyers DNA Testing equalization payment Family Law Act family lawyers father's spousal support H1N1 Vaccination Interesting Family Law Cases Interjurisdictional Support Order Act ISO Act jesse james divorce John Tait Krislock v. Krislock marry after divorce Matrimonial Home Mayberry-vs-Mayberry Parental Alienation Syndrome Prenup prenuptuals sandra bullock separation Shawn Goldman special or extraordinary expenses Stu Webb Supervised Access Program Susan Desrochers swine flu vaccination Tiger Woods Vital Statistics Act

Follow Us on Twitter

Find Us on Facebook

Facebook Privacy Issues and Ontario Family Courts

The social networking website called Facebook is a tool to exchange information that has now made its way into the courtroom and is being used as evidence in litigation, particularly in family law disputes. In the United States, Facebook messages are commonly used in family law cases, as well as in civil and criminal cases and jury selection; while in Canada, the use of Facebook as documentary evidence is steadily on the rise.

Facebook has recently simplified its privacy settings and a user can now set his or her Facebook settings to enable only persons the user has manually added to their “friends list” with the ability to access and view the user’s on-line profile.

Another important feature within Facebook’s account privacy settings is the user’s ability to limit the information “friends” can view on the user’s profile. For instance, a user can prevent an ex-spouse or soon to be ex-spouse from viewing photos, relationship status, or wall postings.

Facebook users should be aware of a specific privacy setting that is available for ‘Applications’. Even though some users do not have the game FarmVille, or similar Facebook games uploaded to their profile, when a user’s “friend” has installed the game on their profile that game now has the capability of pulling personal Facebook information and photos from any listed “friends” of that individual. An adjustment to the privacy settings to prevent any sharing of information with an Application is recommended.

Due to the increase in the use of Facebook as documentary evidence in several recent Ontario family law court cases, Facebook users with pending court matters should not post information pertaining to the case and should also consider adjusting their privacy settings to avoid the possibility of having personal information used against them in court. 

 

---

Police Enforcement of Custody and Access Orders

Custodial and access (also known as “visitation”) rights under a court order or from a separation agreement are enforceable under the Criminal Code of Canada and the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction.  Both the Code and the Convention serve to protect a child’s right to security and stability by enforcing custody orders and prohibiting child abductions, locally and internationally.

The enforcement of custodial and access rights in Ontario is also governed by the Children’s Law Reform Act (CLRA).  Pursuant to section 36 of the Act, if a family court judge is satisfied that there are “reasonable and probable grounds for believing that a person is unlawfully withholding a child” the court has the ability to compel the police to enforce a custody or access order and may authorize the police to locate, apprehend, and deliver the child to the person entitled to custody or access of that child.

Courts have refused to grant an order for police enforcement on the grounds that it would be intrusive and a potentially frightening method of enforcement to a child.   Drake v. Cox (1993). Such a result would not be in the best interests of a child and some courts have instead opted to punish an act of willful contempt by imposing either a fine or imprisonment for the failure to comply with a custodial or access arrangement as stipulated by the court.

Courts can issue police enforcement orders if deemed appropriate in light of the surrounding circumstances, such as a history of unjustified access denial between the parties, serious threats of non-removal of the child, or to maintain the relationship between the child and the person entitled to custody or access, and that such enforcement would outweigh any potential risks.

For more information about the enforcement of your custodial or access arrangement, contact us at 416 222 4555 or info@divorcesupport.ca.

---

What Are My Child Visitation or Access Rights as a Non-Parent?

Access for Parents

Access (also known as “visitation”) is the child’s right to have contact with his or her non-custodial parent after a separation or divorce.  Access can be determined informally between the parents, by way of a written agreement, or a court can make an order.

Who else may Seek Access?

In addition to a biological parent, other persons who have had or want to have a relationship with a child may also seek reasonable access pursuant to section 21 of the Children’s Law Reform Act and section 16(3) of the Divorce Act. “Non-parents” include grandparents and other relatives, step-parents, and common-law partners who are not the biological parent of the child.

Procedure for Grandparents and other Non-Parents to Request Access to a Child

Non-parents must seek leave (permission) from the court to submit an application for access. A court can grant an order for access to a non-parent under a number of circumstances, including where the non-parent has had a close relationship and is seeking to continue to spend time with the child.  The merits of an application for access are determined based on whether it would be in the child’s “best interests” and whether there is “some beneficial connection” between the non-parent and the child.  J.H. v. B.G. (1993).

Considerations for Granting Access to Non-Parents

As a general rule, biological parents have the right to determine with whom their children will associate. However, a judge can override a parent’s access decision on the premise that the child would benefit from having contact with the non-parent, particularly if there is a genuine bond between the child and the non-parent and whether severing any pre-existing relationship would have an adverse impact upon the child.

An order for access will not be granted if the biological parent can provide compelling reasons that denying access to the non-parent would be in the child’s best interests.

Contact a Family Lawyer who can assist you in understanding the judicial process and your rights and obligations before filing an application for access with the court. Call Niren and Associates Family Law Practice at 416 222 4555 or email us at info@divorcesupport.ca.

---

2010 Brings Major Changes to Family Law in Ontario

Commencing March 1, 2010, the McGuinty government will be implementing major reforms to a variety of Family Law matters in Ontario.  The reforms have been introduced with the objective of improving the public’s access to justice in family courts.

The following are some highlights of the changes that will take effect under the new legislation:

• Family law litigants will have greater access to legal advice and the opportunity to resolve issues through the use of mediation, arbitration, and collaborative family law
• Steps to family law litigation will be streamlined and simplified
• Steps to obtaining a restraining order have been modified
• Child support amounts pursuant to either a court order or a domestic contract filed with the court may be recalculated by a child support service to reflect updated income information
• Additional evidentiary requirements must now be met when filing an application for custody or access to a child, including an accompanying affidavit containing a proposed plan for the child’s care and upbringing and information regarding the person’s current or previous involvement in any family law and criminal proceedings
• Every person applying for child custody or access who is not a parent must complete and provide to the court the results of a police records check and a children’s aid society report
• Where a person is declared to be the parent of a child, his or her written consent is required to change the child’s surname, if consent cannot be obtained or is refused an application can be made to the court
• Where a person is declared to be the parent of a child, an application can be made to the court to request that the child’s surname  be changed to any surname that the child could have been given at birth
• The definition of “Net Family Property” has been amended to include any contingent tax liabilities when calculating a spouse’s debts and liabilities on the date of  separation
• “Property” is to include the imputed value of a spouse’s interest in a pension plan

Full details of the upcoming reforms are still to be released by the government.

Check back to our blog for further details once the family law changes come into effect on March 1, 2010.

For further information on family law and divorce contact us at info@divorcesupport.ca or call us at 416 222 4555

---

Child Protection, Custody and Access with the Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OLC)

The Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OCL) is an independent law office within the Ministry of the Attorney General offering services on behalf of children respecting their personal and property rights.

OCL investigates, advocates, protects and represents the personal and property rights and obligations of children in proceedings before the courts and tribunals of Ontario.

In house Toronto staff of lawyers, articling students and clinical investigators carry a personal caseload and supervise members of the OCL panels who do Children’s Lawyer work across the province.

To get the OCL involved in the custody/access proceedings, one or more of the parties may ask the court to make an order appointing the Children’s Lawyer.

The appointment of the Children’s Lawyer may assist the court when it requires independent information and representation about the interests, needs and wishes of the child or children who is subject of the proceedings.

The Children’s Lawyer does not represent children in child support matters in custody/access cases.

For more information about the OLC or child custody or access issues contact us at 416 222 4555 or info@divorcesupport.ca

---