The social networking website called Facebook is a tool to exchange information that has now made its way into the courtroom and is being used as evidence in litigation, particularly in family law disputes. In the United States, Facebook messages are commonly used in family law cases, as well as in civil and criminal cases and jury selection; while in Canada, the use of Facebook as documentary evidence is steadily on the rise.
Facebook has recently simplified its privacy settings and a user can now set his or her Facebook settings to enable only persons the user has manually added to their “friends list” with the ability to access and view the user’s on-line profile.
Another important feature within Facebook’s account privacy settings is the user’s ability to limit the information “friends” can view on the user’s profile. For instance, a user can prevent an ex-spouse or soon to be ex-spouse from viewing photos, relationship status, or wall postings.
Facebook users should be aware of a specific privacy setting that is available for ‘Applications’. Even though some users do not have the game FarmVille, or similar Facebook games uploaded to their profile, when a user’s “friend” has installed the game on their profile that game now has the capability of pulling personal Facebook information and photos from any listed “friends” of that individual. An adjustment to the privacy settings to prevent any sharing of information with an Application is recommended.
Due to the increase in the use of Facebook as documentary evidence in several recent Ontario family law court cases, Facebook users with pending court matters should not post information pertaining to the case and should also consider adjusting their privacy settings to avoid the possibility of having personal information used against them in court.
In Ontario, an unmarried couple is considered to be in a common law marriage if they’ve lived together for over three years or have a child and live in a relationship of some kind of permanence. As such, when they break up they may be entitled to spousal support and a division of assets just as if the couple were legally married originally.
In Quebec, unmarried couples (even if they are common law) are not entitled to any such support.
The case of Eric and Lola, a billionaire and his ex-spouse, was heard last year in a Quebec court and a judge decided that only legally married spouses should be entitled to support in the event of a marriage breakdown. Their full names are not currently publishable due to a publication ban, but the media has dubbed them “Eric and Lola”.
The case is to be heard in the Quebec Court of Appeal this week, and should prove why not allowing spousal support for unmarried but conjugal couples is unconstitutional. Eric and Lola are also parents, and only a few years ago almost 60 per cent of children in Quebec were born to parents who weren’t married.
Without the appropriate spousal support in place for these two, as with any common-law parenting couple that breaks up, one parent may not be financially stable enough to provide for a child adequately.
Ontario couples are lucky, because the work, financial contributions and time that goes into a common law relationship is recognized by Ontario family law when the union breaks up. Hopefully, those in Quebec will soon be just as fairly treated.
In Ontario family law cases, spousal support and child support payments are calculated based on a person’s income. However, in a given year, one might generate income that they do not normally earn. This income is not from a regular paycheck, but is generated by other means. Ontario judges are able to use their own discretion when it comes to this non-recurring income, and it generally increases the child or spousal support payments. Support income is not necessarily always the same as tax income.
Some of these forms of non-recurring income include:
Capital Gains: Capital gains may be used to increase support payments, but capital losses are not generally used to lower the person’s overall income when it comes to paying child or spousal support. If any capital gains are immediately reinvested, such as small business revenue going back into the business, they’re not usually considered income.
Severance Packages: If one is laid off and receives a severance package they may find a job right away and report a much higher income for that year, which usually would be used for spousal or child support calculations.
RRSP Redemption
These types of income are included on income tax income but not necessarily spousal or child support income, unless it is repeated every year.
Awards from Lawsuits:
Awards for the loss on income are usually reported as income, but awards for personal suffering are not.
Stocks:
As with RRSP redemptions, if stock options are exercised once in a blue moon they aren’t typically counted. However, if you do it frequently and can establish a pattern of exercising stock options, they may be counted as income.
The legal obligations of fathers who aren’t married to their child’s mother are typically the same as if they were married, with only a few minor differences.
Unlike pregnancies that result from a marriage, in these situations the child may be put up for adoption. If the man is aware of the child’s existence, he may have a decent chance of gaining custody of the child if the mother intends to give it up for adoption.
There are no current laws that force women to tell the father about a pregnancy.
Spousal support for unmarried people doesn’t normally apply. However, it may if the couple falls under the definition of “spouses” as per the Family Law Act. For example, if a couple has lived together for three years or has lived in such a manner that it would appear to be marriage-like to a judge, there can be spousal support involved.
The amount of child support paid by a father is not dependent on whether or not the couple is married. Whether or not the child was expected is also not factored into this decision, although an unmarried father may also be forced to pay for some of any prenatal expenses, according to the Family Law Act in Ontario.
While in the United States and Canada women have the choice as to whether they want to go through with a pregnancy or not, men do not have such a choice. In 2006, a man in Michigan was ordered to pay almost $500 per month in child support to his ex-girlfriend, even though she was well aware he did not want to have a child and she had told him many times that she was physically unable to get pregnant. Some may argue that if the woman did not want to abort the child and refused to put it up for adoption she should have been able to pay for the child herself. The case was dubbed “Roe v. Wade for Men” and attempted to prove this very notion with a lawsuit, but the lawsuit was eventually dismissed.
It’s tax season again, and divorce and child custody bring up several new situations that can be reported on your taxes. There are also a few new ways to reduce your income taxes and ensure everything is reported accurately.
The ex-spouse who pays spousal support can deduct it from their taxes, whereas the ex-spouse who receives the payments must pay tax on the amount they receive. Keep in mind that a lump sum payment of spousal support is not tax deductible.
Child support payments are not usually deductible. However, if the support order was given before May 1, 1997, then the support payments are deductible. Likewise, if a person is receiving support payments from an order given before May 1, 1997, taxes are paid on those payments. Otherwise, no taxes are paid on child support payments received.
If you receive child support you might be able to claim an equivalent-to-spouse credit for one of your children on your tax return.
In some cases, legal fees may be tax deductible. Normally legal fees incurred due to a divorce are not, but fees incurred to enforcing child support or to obtain an order for child and spousal support are.
The primary caregiver of a child is entitled to claim the Canada Child Tax Benefit. If the situation involves shared custody of the child, each parent is entitled to half of it under normal circumstances.
We are not accountants so for professional accounting advise seek a qualified accountant, but these guidelines can provide you with a basic idea of what to expect when filing your taxes as a divorced Canadian.
Pursuant to the Family Responsibility and Support Arrears Enforcement Act, the Family Responsibility Office (“FRO”) was established to ensure that support payments were made between the payor and the recipient. FRO enforces both support orders issued by the Ontario courts and support obligations as set out in domestic contracts that are filed with the courts. FRO can also enforce support orders issued in another province or country with which it has a reciprocating agreement.
Once a case is registered with FRO, the agency then begins the process of both collecting support payments from the payor and then forwarding the payments to the support recipient.
If support payments are not made, FRO has the legal authority to take enforcement action to recover any monies owed. Enforcement action can include garnishment of bank accounts, suspension of the payor’s driver’s licence, garnishment of any monies received from the Federal Government (such as income tax refunds, GST rebates, employment insurance, CPP benefits), suspension of the payor’s Canadian passport, and seizing of lottery winnings. If the support payor has failed to make a support payment for at least six months and FRO has exhausted all efforts to locate the payor, FRO may post personal information and a photograph of the payor on a related website in order to receive assistance from the public in locating the payor.
To avoid such enforcement action, it is in the payor’s best interest to meet his or her support obligations in a timely manner. If a payor’s financial situation changes, the payor should contact FRO to discuss a possible payment plan. The payor should also contact a lawyer to find out what his or her options are, including filing a motion with the court to change the amount of support the payor is required to pay as set out in the support order or domestic contract.
For more information about the enforcement of child and spousal support payments, please contact Niren and Associates Family Law Practice at 416 222 4555 or email us at info@divorcesupport.ca.
When couples separate after ending a relationship, one partner may move to a different province or even a different country. Relocating outside of Ontario can create a challenge when obtaining, enforcing, or varying a child or spousal support order.

The Interjurisdictional Support Order Unit of the Family Responsibility Office administers the Interjurisdictional Support Order Act, 2002 (“ISO Act”). Under the ISO Act, support orders issued by a court outside of Ontario can be registered and enforced with a court in Ontario.
A key element of the ISO Act is that a hearing is held in one jurisdiction, whereby the applicant (the personal applying for the support order) can apply to obtain or change a support order in a reciprocating jurisdiction without having to appear in person.
A “reciprocal jurisdiction” is a jurisdiction that has entered into an arrangement with Ontario to enforce support orders. All Canadian provinces and territories, the United States of America, and several other countries, including the United Kingdom, Figi, South Africa, Switzerland, and Barbados, are reciprocating jurisdictions.
To commence the application process, the applicant must complete and submit an application for support to the ISO Unit office. The office reviews the application and sends a copy to the proper authority in the reciprocating jurisdiction nearest to the residence of the respondent. The application is then forwarded to the appropriate court and a court date is set. The respondent is notified about the proceedings and is provided with an opportunity to file a response.
At a hearing, after reviewing the evidence submitted, a judge will render a decision and make an order on the issue of support. Once registered, the order will be of same force and effect as if rendered by an Ontario court for the purposes of enforcement.
The ISO application procedure can involve complex questions about which jurisdiction’s laws apply and how the various laws can affect you. Contact Niren and Associates Family Law Practice at 416 222 4555 or email us at info@divorcesupport.ca to speak with an experienced family law and divorce lawyer who can advise you about your rights and guide you through the process of obtaining support.