In many divorce cases involving a minor child, the judge renders a decision on the issues of both custody and support and typically orders that the non-custodial parent pay child support to the custodial parent for the child until a termination date. In Canada, child support payments end once the child is no longer deemed a “dependent” under the law.
For most situations, a child will be entitled to child support until 18 years of age. However, in many cases the “until-18 rule” will not apply and the child may be entitled to support beyond the “age of majority”. For instance, a child over 18 years of age is still entitled to child support if the child is a full-time student in school, even if the child has a part-time job while attending school. The child support obligations do not end because the law assumes that full-time students are still dependents and are unable to support themselves. Along with child support, the non-custodial parent may also have an obligation to contribute to the child’s special expenses, which would include the costs associated with attending school, such as tuition.
Child support is governed by federal law and does not change from province to province, although the amounts may differ based on the cost of living for the area. In cases when the child support termination date is not specified in the support order, the support payments may continue until the child has obtained a post-secondary degree or as long as the child is in school full-time. It is also not unheard of, albeit rare, for child support to be paid even while the child completes further schooling, including a graduate degree, particularly if the educational program is required in order for the child to pursue his or her desired occupation.
To terminate the payor’s child support obligations, the payor must file a motion to change a final order with the court and have the court issue a new order ending the support payments. For payments enforced by the Family Responsibility Office, the payor can contact the government agency to inform the office of the change in circumstances and obtain consent from the support recipient to terminate the payments.
The social networking website called Facebook is a tool to exchange information that has now made its way into the courtroom and is being used as evidence in litigation, particularly in family law disputes. In the United States, Facebook messages are commonly used in family law cases, as well as in civil and criminal cases and jury selection; while in Canada, the use of Facebook as documentary evidence is steadily on the rise.
Facebook has recently simplified its privacy settings and a user can now set his or her Facebook settings to enable only persons the user has manually added to their “friends list” with the ability to access and view the user’s on-line profile.
Another important feature within Facebook’s account privacy settings is the user’s ability to limit the information “friends” can view on the user’s profile. For instance, a user can prevent an ex-spouse or soon to be ex-spouse from viewing photos, relationship status, or wall postings.
Facebook users should be aware of a specific privacy setting that is available for ‘Applications’. Even though some users do not have the game FarmVille, or similar Facebook games uploaded to their profile, when a user’s “friend” has installed the game on their profile that game now has the capability of pulling personal Facebook information and photos from any listed “friends” of that individual. An adjustment to the privacy settings to prevent any sharing of information with an Application is recommended.
Due to the increase in the use of Facebook as documentary evidence in several recent Ontario family law court cases, Facebook users with pending court matters should not post information pertaining to the case and should also consider adjusting their privacy settings to avoid the possibility of having personal information used against them in court.
The legal obligations of fathers who aren’t married to their child’s mother are typically the same as if they were married, with only a few minor differences.
Unlike pregnancies that result from a marriage, in these situations the child may be put up for adoption. If the man is aware of the child’s existence, he may have a decent chance of gaining custody of the child if the mother intends to give it up for adoption.
There are no current laws that force women to tell the father about a pregnancy.
Spousal support for unmarried people doesn’t normally apply. However, it may if the couple falls under the definition of “spouses” as per the Family Law Act. For example, if a couple has lived together for three years or has lived in such a manner that it would appear to be marriage-like to a judge, there can be spousal support involved.
The amount of child support paid by a father is not dependent on whether or not the couple is married. Whether or not the child was expected is also not factored into this decision, although an unmarried father may also be forced to pay for some of any prenatal expenses, according to the Family Law Act in Ontario.
While in the United States and Canada women have the choice as to whether they want to go through with a pregnancy or not, men do not have such a choice. In 2006, a man in Michigan was ordered to pay almost $500 per month in child support to his ex-girlfriend, even though she was well aware he did not want to have a child and she had told him many times that she was physically unable to get pregnant. Some may argue that if the woman did not want to abort the child and refused to put it up for adoption she should have been able to pay for the child herself. The case was dubbed “Roe v. Wade for Men” and attempted to prove this very notion with a lawsuit, but the lawsuit was eventually dismissed.
Pursuant to the Family Responsibility and Support Arrears Enforcement Act, the Family Responsibility Office (“FRO”) was established to ensure that support payments were made between the payor and the recipient. FRO enforces both support orders issued by the Ontario courts and support obligations as set out in domestic contracts that are filed with the courts. FRO can also enforce support orders issued in another province or country with which it has a reciprocating agreement.
Once a case is registered with FRO, the agency then begins the process of both collecting support payments from the payor and then forwarding the payments to the support recipient.
If support payments are not made, FRO has the legal authority to take enforcement action to recover any monies owed. Enforcement action can include garnishment of bank accounts, suspension of the payor’s driver’s licence, garnishment of any monies received from the Federal Government (such as income tax refunds, GST rebates, employment insurance, CPP benefits), suspension of the payor’s Canadian passport, and seizing of lottery winnings. If the support payor has failed to make a support payment for at least six months and FRO has exhausted all efforts to locate the payor, FRO may post personal information and a photograph of the payor on a related website in order to receive assistance from the public in locating the payor.
To avoid such enforcement action, it is in the payor’s best interest to meet his or her support obligations in a timely manner. If a payor’s financial situation changes, the payor should contact FRO to discuss a possible payment plan. The payor should also contact a lawyer to find out what his or her options are, including filing a motion with the court to change the amount of support the payor is required to pay as set out in the support order or domestic contract.
For more information about the enforcement of child and spousal support payments, please contact Niren and Associates Family Law Practice at 416 222 4555 or email us at info@divorcesupport.ca.
Commencing March 1, 2010, the McGuinty government will be implementing major reforms to a variety of Family Law matters in Ontario. The reforms have been introduced with the objective of improving the public’s access to justice in family courts.
The following are some highlights of the changes that will take effect under the new legislation:
Full details of the upcoming reforms are still to be released by the government.
Check back to our blog for further details once the family law changes come into effect on March 1, 2010.
For further information on family law and divorce contact us at info@divorcesupport.ca or call us at 416 222 4555
When couples separate after ending a relationship, one partner may move to a different province or even a different country. Relocating outside of Ontario can create a challenge when obtaining, enforcing, or varying a child or spousal support order.

The Interjurisdictional Support Order Unit of the Family Responsibility Office administers the Interjurisdictional Support Order Act, 2002 (“ISO Act”). Under the ISO Act, support orders issued by a court outside of Ontario can be registered and enforced with a court in Ontario.
A key element of the ISO Act is that a hearing is held in one jurisdiction, whereby the applicant (the personal applying for the support order) can apply to obtain or change a support order in a reciprocating jurisdiction without having to appear in person.
A “reciprocal jurisdiction” is a jurisdiction that has entered into an arrangement with Ontario to enforce support orders. All Canadian provinces and territories, the United States of America, and several other countries, including the United Kingdom, Figi, South Africa, Switzerland, and Barbados, are reciprocating jurisdictions.
To commence the application process, the applicant must complete and submit an application for support to the ISO Unit office. The office reviews the application and sends a copy to the proper authority in the reciprocating jurisdiction nearest to the residence of the respondent. The application is then forwarded to the appropriate court and a court date is set. The respondent is notified about the proceedings and is provided with an opportunity to file a response.
At a hearing, after reviewing the evidence submitted, a judge will render a decision and make an order on the issue of support. Once registered, the order will be of same force and effect as if rendered by an Ontario court for the purposes of enforcement.
The ISO application procedure can involve complex questions about which jurisdiction’s laws apply and how the various laws can affect you. Contact Niren and Associates Family Law Practice at 416 222 4555 or email us at info@divorcesupport.ca to speak with an experienced family law and divorce lawyer who can advise you about your rights and guide you through the process of obtaining support.